Safety issues arise at busy intersection in Oakmont |

Safety issues arise at busy intersection in Oakmont


Motorists continue to ignore turning restrictions by Riverview High School in Oakmont, and it’s causing student safety concerns, district officials say.

Third Street is right-turn-only onto Hulton Road from 7 to 9 a.m. and 2 to 4 p.m. weekdays, and 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. Saturdays.

Motorists cannot make a right onto Third Street from Hulton Road during those times either.

However, Riverview School District Spokesperson Carrie DelRosso said drivers have not been following the guidelines.

“Enforcing our traffic restrictions and maintaining state and local road safety is of utmost priority to both the Oakmont Borough and the Riverview School District,” DelRosso said.

Oakmont Police Chief Michael Ford said his department is aware of the problem and has issued $170 citations to motorists who failed to comply.

“We have turning restrictions in place for the children and crossing guard safety,” he said. “There (are) regular details down there now.”

Those details will continue, he said.

People use Third Street as a cut-through to avoid Allegheny Avenue and Allegheny River Boulevard when traffic backs up by the Hulton Bridge.

There’s been an increase in traffic along Third Street due to a brick replacement project at the intersection of Pennsylvania Avenue and Allegheny River Boulevard near the Oakmont Carnegie Library.

That project is expected to be complete within the next few weeks.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.