ShareThis Page
Brentwood pool bids rejected; ‘no frills’ work considered |
South Hills

Brentwood pool bids rejected; ‘no frills’ work considered

Jim Spezialetti
| Tuesday, August 22, 2017 12:51 p.m
Randy Jarosz | For Trib Total Media
Brentwood Public Pool supervisor Tereeq Smith of Carrick plays a volleyball game with Spencer Beauregard, 11, of Brentwood, Sunday, Sept. 7, 2015 at Brentwood Public Pool.

Plans for the Brentwood pool renovation project will be reduced as bids came in more than double the anticipated cost.

Borough officials had budgeted $714,000 for the first phase of the pool, with payments made this year and in 2018. The lowest of two bids received was $1.8 million, which included $374,165 in alternate work. Council members voted to reject the bids during their Aug. 21 meeting.

A representative for Gateway Engineers will meet with council members at the Aug. 28 meeting to revise the scope of the project and develop other options.

Borough manager George Zboyovsky said council members will consider a “no frills” pool, meaning no double slide or climbing wall, which was in the original bid package.

The project might only entail the necessary repairs, such as installing a liner system into the pool, repairing the gutter system and repairing some of the concrete decking, Zboyovsky said.

The borough received a $175,000 Community Infrastructure and Tourism Fund grant to help with the renovations. Zboyovsky said if the scope of the project is reduced, the grant could be affected.

Jim Spezialetti is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5805, or via Twitter @TribJimSpez.

Categories: South Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.