ShareThis Page
Whitehall anti-flooding effort progressing toward start of work |
South Hills

Whitehall anti-flooding effort progressing toward start of work

Jim Spezialetti
| Monday, October 3, 2016 3:07 p.m

Plans are moving forward to try to reduce potential flooding in the Doverdell Drive area of Whitehall.

Borough engineer Ruthann Omer updated council last week about the $4 million storm and sanitary sewer project.

She said 23 easements have been obtained out of the 39 needed to begin the project.

Engineers have met with all residents and continue to work with those who have decks that will be affected.

Omer said all permits are in place as they work to obtain the easements. No date has been set to begin the work.

The borough is seeking a reimbursement from the new Alcosan Grow Grant program.

Omer said requests can be made for up to $1 million. The borough’s letter of interest for the grant was accepted. The application is due by the end of October.

Alcosan officials will inform the borough what amount it will be eligible to receive.

Meter replacement

Whitehall Manager James Leventry said Duquesne Light Co. will be in the borough this month to replace residential meters. Customers will be notified and do not need to be home.

He said he was informed that there will be no disruption of service. Leventry said the company was asked to notify Whitehall police when employees will be in the neighborhood.

Jim Spezialetti is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5805 or

Categories: South Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.