Archive

ShareThis Page
Whitehall officials aim to clear up questions about planned sewer fee | TribLIVE.com
South Hills

Whitehall officials aim to clear up questions about planned sewer fee

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 12, 2014 9:00 p.m

Whitehall leaders outlined plans on Nov. 5 to implement a fee some property owners could be required to pay beginning Jan. 1 to help fund improvements to the borough’s storm water system.

The questions are simple, according to Whitehall’s borough manager — he said they simply want to know why it’s happening and where the money is going.

“Once we tell them, most people are accepting of it,” James Leventry said.

The fee comes as leaders are planning to make improvements to the storm water system in an effort to curtail flooding, fix old piping and perform routine maintenance to aging lines, Leventry said.

The fee likely would bring in about $625,000 a year to offset the cost of storm water projects, he said. The average homeowner would pay $8 per month, or $96 per year. The fee would be charged to residents on a quarterly basis, paired with the sanitary-sewer bill, Leventry said.

Borough council members voted 6-0 last week — with Councilman Ryan Barton absent — to put an ordinance outlining the establishment of the fee on display for public review.

Council likely will vote on the adoption of the ordinance on Nov. 19 at 8 p.m. in council chambers, 100 Borough Park Drive.

As of Monday afternoon, Leventry said he had not received any calls from residents about the proposed fee. Representatives from seven larger properties that would see the most impact from the fee attended a special meeting last month.

The other question residents are asking, Leventry said, is whether the fee is permanent.

“It’s here for the foreseeable future,” he said.

Mandates through the state Department of Environmental Protection’s storm water permitting process, along with the need for improvement to the system, led Whitehall leaders to broach implementing the fee, Leventry said.

The borough has $5 million in storm water projects in the works.

Borough leaders want to offset the new fee for the average resident by decreasing sanitary-sewer bills, Leventry said. How that will play out remains undetermined.

Whitehall has a $5 million fund balance in its sanitary-sewer fund.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.