ShareThis Page
WJHSD upping efforts to stop plagiarism |
South Hills

WJHSD upping efforts to stop plagiarism

West Jefferson Hills School District students thinking about snatching their sibling’s paper and submitting it as their own better think again.

Teachers will be keeping a better eye out for copied work, as the school board on Aug. 28 approved an agreement with Turnitin LLC to check submitted papers at Thomas Jefferson High School for plagiarism. The program costs $3,901 for the 2018-19 school year.

“Here’s the thing: It’s been around for a long time. Most colleges, most high schools use,” Superintendent Michael Ghilani said.

Ghilani said every high school both he and Scott Milburn, assistant superintendent of secondary education, have worked for have used anti-plagiarism software.

The program will be utilized first in English and social studies classes.

It runs papers checked in the system against everything from what’s on the internet to archives kept in the system from high schools and colleges across the country. Every paper scanned is archived in the system, so a student 10 years from now can’t take their sibling’s paper and try and use it, Ghilani said.

“It checks it against every online college and high school in the entire country to see if there’s any passages, paragraphs, sentences that have been plagiarized,” he said.

The software also can provide anecdotal feedback to students. However, West Jefferson Hills is only using it as an anti-plagiarism tool to start.

“It’s a great tool to teach kids integrity,” Ghilani said.

Stephanie Hacke is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.