ShareThis Page
12 elementary students survive crash into Greenfield home |

12 elementary students survive crash into Greenfield home

Kim Lyons
| Monday, March 6, 2006 12:00 a.m

Twelve elementary school students survived a crash this morning, when their bus careened off a steep hillside and plowed into a Greenfield home.

“If you look at where the bus ended up, it’s amazing it didn’t flip over,” said Pittsburgh police Sgt. Rich Begenwald. “This could have been a lot worse, for sure. You come around that turn too fast, it’s very sharp.”

The bus, bound for RAPAH Charter School in East Liberty, plummeted from Swinburne Street into a house on Boundary Road just after 7:30 a.m. Four children were taken to Children’s Hospital in Oakland, with non-life-threatening injuries, said Pittsburgh EMS Chief Bob McCaughan. One of the children might have suffered a broken leg, emergency workers said.

The driver of the bus was taken to UPMC Presbyterian, McCaughan said, and his injuries also were considered minor. McCaughan declined to release the driver’s name, or the names of the injured children.

The homeowner, Charles Haynie, 89, was taken to Mercy Hospital to be checked out, but he walked out of the house unassisted and appeared uninjured, McCaughan said.

The house is located at the top of a steep, wooded hillside that sits on the brink of Panther Hollow, near the border with South Oakland.

Pittsburgh School Police took the eight uninjured children to school, Begenwald said.

Police still are trying to determine if the crash was caused by driver error or mechanical failure, he said.

There were skid marks where the bus went off the road and struck the house. A damage estimate for the house was not available this morning, but the entire rear of the house appeared demolished.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.