ShareThis Page
‘127 hours’ hiker rhapsodizes problem-solving for CMU grads |

‘127 hours’ hiker rhapsodizes problem-solving for CMU grads

Rachel Weaver
| Monday, May 16, 2011 12:00 p.m

Aron Ralston, the hiker forced to amputate part of his arm after becoming trapped in a Utah canyon, stressed the importance of turning “boulders into blessings” while addressing graduates of Carnegie Mellon University yesterday.

“Yes, it hurt, but I did not lose anything that day,” the CMU alumnus told the crowd of nearly 4,000 graduates in CMU’s Gesling Stadium. “I gained a sense of what’s important to me and what’s extraordinary in me.”

Ralston, 35, is the author of the memoir “Between a Rock and a Hard Place,” which inspired the 2010 Oscar-nominated film “127 Hours.” In 2003, Ralston went hiking alone in Utah without telling anyone of his whereabouts. He fell into a canyon and became trapped by a dislodged boulder that crushed his right arm.

Nearly six days later, the dehydrated and sleep-deprived Ralston opted to amputate his own forearm to survive.

Holding the lectern with a metal prosthetic, Ralston, who graduated from CMU in 1997 with a degree in mechanical engineering, told the crowd of his unconventional decision five years into his career as a corporate engineer with Intel. He quit his job to pursue his love of the outdoors.

“My parents were reluctantly supportive,” he said. “They told me before I could ever sleep on their couch, I had to get health insurance. That’s my first piece of advice: When the time comes to quit your job and follow your dreams, do it. Just make sure you have health insurance.”

Ralston said the day he became trapped by the half-ton boulder, he “turned to the analytical problem-solving skill I gained at CMU.”

“Step one: define the problem. That was the easy part. There was this big rock,” he said, garnering laughter. “The next step was to gather information, come up with possible solutions, prioritize them and try one.”

He combated hypothermia by wrapping his climbing rope around himself. He rationed his food and water. When those ran out, he resorted to drinking his own urine.

“It helps you keep things in perspective,” he said. “When you think things have gotten bad, just remember: If you didn’t have to drink your urine today, it’s not that bad.”

Ralston, who recorded his experience on camera through messages to friends and family, stressed the importance of nurturing relationships.

“When I was on the brink of death, I didn’t eulogize myself with my life accomplishments. I turned to my loved ones to say thank you,” he said.

Knowing he might bleed to death, Ralston used his knife to cut through his arm. The blade stopped at the bone.

“I realized I wasn’t trapped by the boulder, I was trapped by the blade,” he said. “That leads me to my third piece of advice: If you’re going to carry a knife, make sure it’s sharp.”

Using the boulder for leverage to snap his bone, Ralston pulled himself out of the canyon, rappelled 65 feet and walked seven miles to rescue.

Although Ralston disobeyed commonsense rules by embarking on a long hike and not alerting anyone of his plans, the new alumni agreed the lesson he learned from the experience was more important.

“He was quite candid about his experience,” said Marya Spring Cordes, 42, who received a master’s in fine arts and directing. “It was refreshing.”

Today, Ralston is a wilderness advocate and the only person with a disability to climb all 59 of Colorado’s highest peaks and ski from the summit of Denali, North America’s tallest mountain. He also is the first amputee to tow a raft through the Grand Canyon.

Photo Galleries

CMU Graduation

CMU Graduation

Carnegie Mellon University graduation ceremonies in Oakland Sunday, May 15, 2011.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.