ShareThis Page
2 former inmates sue Indiana County jail, guards over sex assaults |

2 former inmates sue Indiana County jail, guards over sex assaults

| Friday, June 1, 2012 11:18 a.m

Two former female prisoners claim in a lawsuit moved to federal court today that one female Indiana County jail guard sexually assaulted them and another female guard threatened or attempted to harm them.

The Tribune-Review doesn’t name the victims of sexual assaults. The two guards named in the lawsuit are facing state charges for the alleged assaults and threats.

Molly Ann Gross, 43, of Ligonier is charged with 16 counts of terroristic threats, official oppression and institutional sexual assault. She’s charged in a second case with one count each of terroristic threats, witness intimidation, official oppression and harassment. Margaret Jane Dailey, 51, of Indiana is charged with six counts of terroristic threats and official oppression.

The two former inmates are also suing the jail, the county, the county prison board and Warden Carol Hummel. The county asked for the case to be reassigned to federal court today because the women are claiming violations of their constitutional rights. The lawyer representing the county and warden couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.