2 Uniontown men arrested in string of burglaries |

2 Uniontown men arrested in string of burglaries

Daniel Joe Beck Jr., 28, of Uniontown was charged with conspiracy to commit burglary, burglary, theft and receiving stolen property for 15 burglaries.

Two Uniontown men were arrested by state police last week in connection with a string of 15 burglaries in North Union and South Union.

Jordan Blachowicz and Daniel Joe Beck Jr., both 28, were charged with conspiracy, burglary and theft. Beck also was charged with receiving stolen property.

“We’ve had an increase in our burglaries in the last couple months, and we had a couple people of interest,” said Uniontown police Lt. Tom Kolencik.

Police said tips from neighbors led them to the two suspects. Blachowicz had a warrant out for his arrest for unrelated charges in Massachusetts, according to police.

When police arrived at Beck’s home, they found both suspects, along with drug paraphernalia, police said.

They returned with a warrant and found jewelry, cellphones, cameras and guns that had been reported stolen from Fayette County homes, Kolencik said.

Beck later confessed to police that he was responsible for 15 burglaries, and that he had been stealing to support his drug habit, Kolencik said.

The victims of many recent burglaries were called to the police station, and all of them were able to identify some of their missing items among evidence taken from Beck’s house, Kolencik said.

The investigation is ongoing. Blachowicz has yet to be directly tied to any of the burglaries, but more charges against both men are anticipated, Kolencik said.

Police have not yet calculated the value of the items found at Beck’s home.

Both men were arraigned before District Judge Ronald Haggerty and taken to the Fayette County Prison. Bail was set at $20,000 each.

Jacob Tierney is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6646 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.