27 vote in wrong race in Fayette County |

27 vote in wrong race in Fayette County

Election workers in Fayette County spent part of Tuesday contacting 27 voters who cast ballots for the wrong state representative because voting machines were incorrectly programmed in two precincts.

Eleven of the voters cast ballots before 8:15 a.m. in Jefferson, and 16 used incorrect ballots in Lower Tyrone before 10 a.m., when the mistakes were discovered, according to motions filed in civil court by Sheryl Heid, county solicitor.

She told President Judge John F. Wagner Jr. during an impromptu hearing shortly before noon that one machine in each of the two precincts was incorrectly programmed.

Wagner voided the votes for only the state representative races.

He directed the election bureau to contact each of the 27 voters and provide them with provisional ballots.

“I want to be certain that each of these voters gets a chance to vote,” Wagner said.

“It’s an affirmative obligation on the county’s part to make certain these folks who took the time to vote get one, no matter what lengths we have to go.”

Wagner suggested “someone get in their county car” and personally deliver the ballots to the affected voters, if necessary.

Heid said election workers spoke directly with 10 of the voters in Jefferson before the polls closed Tuesday.

Each voter was making arrangements to obtain provisional ballots, which must be returned to the election bureau by Nov. 12.

She said workers were “not as successful in reaching the voters from Lower Tyrone,” but phone messages were left for all of them.

Each of the voters will be mailed provisional ballots, Heid said, and the election bureau will continue to try to contact them.

The Jefferson voters got a ballot from Henry Clay, and the Lower Tyrone voters got a Jefferson ballot, officials said.

Liz Zemba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.