3 arrested on gambling charges waive right to hearing, await trial |

3 arrested on gambling charges waive right to hearing, await trial

A Monongahela man accused of participating in a Washington-based gambling ring waived his right to a preliminary hearing Tuesday.

Daniel Piccolo, 75, of 143 Greenridge Drive, was scheduled to appear before District Justice Jay Weller in Canonsburg on charges of pool selling, bookmaking, a count of lotteries and criminal conspiracy.

Piccolo is one of several area men who were charged following a two-year investigation of a gambling ring authorities allege was based at the Union Grill, 13 E. Wheeling St., Washington.

The restaurant’s owner, Michael (Mickey) Flynn, 62, is charged with one count each of participating in corrupt organizations, pool selling and bookmaking, criminal conspiracy and criminal use of a telephone.

The charges were announced Aug. 7 by state Attorney General Mike Fisher following a grand jury recommendation.

Flynn, and his alleged partner in the gambling operation, Charles Martin, 50, of 800 E. Beau St., Washington, also waived their rights to preliminary hearings Tuesday before Weller.

All three men were scheduled for hearings Friday.

Martin is charged with participating in corrupt organizations, one count of pool selling and bookmaking, one count of lotteries, a count of criminal conspiracy and criminal use of a communication facility.

Piccolo is one of several accused bookies who were helping Flynn’s operation, which mainly involved sports betting.

Other men charged in the gambling ring are scheduled to appear before Weller on Friday for their preliminary hearings, including Charles Skorvan, 58, of 2209 Main St., Hillcrest Manor, Monongahela; William Antonio, 58, of Clarksville; Anthony Cihal, 76, of Pittsburgh; Edmund Conoge, 43, of Canton Township; William McGonigle, 69, of Venetia; and John Pankas, 68, of Canonsburg.

Another man, James Celedonia, 50, of Upper St. Clair, was scheduled to waive his case today before Weller.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.