30 indicted in fentanyl-trafficking bust in Mass. |

30 indicted in fentanyl-trafficking bust in Mass.

Confiscated firearms are seen in the foreground as Acting United States Attorney William D. Weinreb announces federal drug, firearm and immigration charges against 30 defendants from the city of Lawrence, Mass., and surrounding communities at Moakley Federal Courthouse Tuesday, May 30, 2017, in Boston. (Jessica Rinaldi /The Boston Globe via AP)

LAWRENCE, Mass. — Federal authorities say more than two dozen people are facing charges after the dismantling of a drug distribution ring in Massachusetts.

The U.S. Attorney’s office said Tuesday the 30 indictments are part of a yearlong investigation dubbed “Operation Bad Company” that targeted the fentanyl, heroin and cocaine trafficking ring in the state. Officials called it “one of the largest fentanyl trafficking organizations ever seen in Massachusetts.”

Authorities say the defendants have been indicted for drug trafficking, gun possession and immigration offenses.

Authorities say the raid in the Lawrence area led to the seizure of more than two kilograms of the synthetic opioid fentanyl and six guns.

The investigation involved more than 200 local, state and federal law enforcement officials.

Lawrence, a former mill town, is about 30 miles north of Boston, near the New Hampshire border.

The alleged leaders of the ring, Juan Anibal Patrone, 26, and Josuel Moises Patrone-Gonzalez, 22, are dual citizens of the Dominican Republic and Italy, according to the U.S. Attorney’s office in Massachusetts. It was not clear whether either of the two had hired an attorney.

A spike in overdose deaths linked to heroin, fentanyl and other opioid drugs has prompted a national crackdown on the trade by law enforcement. Heroin-related overdose deaths quadrupled from 2010 to 2015, when they hit 13,000, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.