ShareThis Page
4 indicted in connection to counterfeiting ring |

4 indicted in connection to counterfeiting ring

Two Fayette County men and a Washington County couple have been indicted by a federal grand jury in connection with the investigation of a counterfeiting ring that operated in Southwestern Pennsylvania.

U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan announced Wednesday that Jason Chiera, 23, of National Avenue, and Patrick Marinelli, 19, of Reliance Avenue, both of Brownsville, have been indicted on a charge of conspiracy to manufacture and pass counterfeit currency.

The indictment alleges that Chiera and Marinelli were part of a group who, in July and August 2004, conspired to manufacture and pass counterfeit currency at various locations.

If found guilty, both men could face up to five years in prison, a fine of $250,000, or both.

David and Melinie Baltich, both 33, of Beallsville Road, Scenery Hill, face a three-count indictment charging them with conspiracy and manufacturing and passing counterfeit currency of various denominations.

The indictment alleges the couple produced the counterfeit bills and then passed them at restaurants, grocery stores and retail establishments.

If convicted on all counts, David Baltich faces 25 years in prison, a $500,000 fine, or both, while Melinie Baltich could be sentenced to 45 years in prison, a $750,000 fine, or both.

Buchanan said the U.S. Secret Service worked in conjunction with local law enforcement during the investigation that resulted in these and other indictments involving a number of Allegheny County residents.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.