4 injured when brakes fail on firetruck in Armstrong County |

4 injured when brakes fail on firetruck in Armstrong County

State police said four people, including a teenager, suffered minor injuries Saturday morning when a Washington Township, Armstrong County, fire truck lost its brakes and overturned while responding to a fire call.

Robert J. Martz Jr. 38, of Adrian was driving north on River Hill Road near the River’s Edge Campground & Marina about 11 a.m. when the 1983 Ford C8000 fire engine lost all brake pressure, according to a report filed by Trooper Jon Pomaybo.

The truck hit a roadside ditch and slid about 350 feet before hitting an embankment and rolling onto its passenger side, Pomaybo wrote.

Martz; Benjamin T. Bowser, 38, of Cowansville; Shawn P. Shaner, 39, of Adrian; and an unidentified 15-year-old girl from Adrian were taken to ACMH Hospital in East Franklin with minor injuries, Pomaybo reported.

A police report indicates only Bowser was wearing a seatbelt; it was unknown if the engine was equipped with safety belts for all seats.

The engine was described as having moderate damage.

No charges were filed.

Officials with the Washington Township Volunteer Fire Department could not be reached for comment over the weekend.

The firefighters were responding to a fire at an unoccupied recreational vehicle, according to information posted on the campground’s Facebook page.

The campground is located along the Allegheny River near Lock and Dam 9 in northern Armstrong County.

Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.