ShareThis Page
4 seek vacant council seat |

4 seek vacant council seat

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Tuesday, January 8, 2002 12:00 a.m

Former Allegheny County Commissioner Bob Cranmer and former Republican Brentwood councilman Martin Vickless are among four candidates vying for a vacant seat on the council now completely controlled by Democrats.

Cranmer, a former county Republican committee chairman and Brentwood Council member, is seeking the appointment as an independent. Two Democrats also are seeking the appointment: Kay Gannis, the borough’s former tax collector; and Mary Ann Caponi-Vojtas, wife of borough police Sgt. John Vojtas. Letters of interest were due Monday and a decision is expected in February.

Vickless, who served one four-year term on council but lost his re-election bid in November, said he had a good relationship with Republicans and Democrats on the council, where bitterness often characterized party divisions. Democrats, who previously held a 5-2 majority on council, won all open council seats and the mayor’s office in the 2001 election.

Vickless said he doesn’t think the new council makeup should automatically preclude the possibility of his being considered.

“If I got it would I be surprised• Yeah,” Vickless said Monday. “But I wouldn’t be totally shocked.”

The vacancy became official last night when former councilman Ken Lockhart, a Democrat, was sworn in as the borough’s new mayor, succeeding Republican Ron Arnoni. Lockhart resigned his council seat with two years remaining in the term.

Cranmer, is seeking the council seat as an independent, said Venie Nicola, borough secretary. Cranmer had been rumored to have been recently considering a run for Congress.

Last year, Gannis and Caponi-Vojtas both sought the council seat left vacant by the death of former councilman David Schade. Schade’s widow, Ann Schade, chairwoman of the borough’s Democratic Committee, was appointed to the seat in November.

David Schade had been the Democratic nominee for mayor before his death Oct. 4. Lockhart replaced him on the ballot.

Gannis had been the borough’s tax collector for 27 years before retiring in May 2001. She said yesterday she is not yet ready to fully embrace retirement.

“I’d just like to go in and do a good job for the people of the borough,” Gannis said of her reasons for seeking the seat.

Caponi-Vojtas could not be reached for comment yesterday. In November she said she is a “separate entity” from her embattled husband and would abstain from decisions regarding him. Council has been pressed to decide whether Vojtas, on desk duty since a jury in a civil lawsuit found him responsible for the 1993 suicide of former fiance Judith Barrett, should be fired or returned to full duty.

Vickless said council has just started making progress on projects such as park renovations and financing for major projects, he had been advocating.

“I think I served the people fairly well over the last four years. I’d like the opportunity to do it again, especially because a two-year term is much more attractive than a four-year term,” he said. “I’d like to have my ideas heard.”

Each member of council is paid $2,400 a year.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701 or

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.