Archive

ShareThis Page
5 arrested on firearms, drug charges in Spring Hill | TribLIVE.com
News

5 arrested on firearms, drug charges in Spring Hill

Tribune-Review
| Sunday, November 23, 2014 1:42 p.m.

Pittsburgh police arrested three men and two women while responding to a 911 call for shots fired at a Spring Hill apartment early Sunday.

Officers responded to an apartment building in the 2100 block of Rhine Place about 2:43 a.m., police spokeswoman Sonya Toler said. When they arrived, they smelled marijuana coming from one of the units. A witness told them the gunshots came from the same unit.

While performing a protective sweep, officers found three guns that had been reported stolen inside a closet, Toler said.

After getting a warrant to search the rest of the apartment, officers found more than 600 stamp bags of heroin, a small amount of marijuana, drug paraphernalia and about $1,000 cash, Toler said.

Police arrested Jaquayla Kendrick, 19, of Garfield; Kent Morton, 26, of Brighton Heights; Jemera Hibbler, 28 of Beltzhoover; Lavelle Johnson, 30, of the Hill District; and Eli Herrine, 24, of Houtzdale in Clearfield County.

They are charged with receiving stolen property, illegally possessing a firearm and possessing illegal drugs. They were being held in the Allegheny County Jail awaiting arraignment.

Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or abrandolph@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.