Archive

ShareThis Page
5 things to watch in Saturday’s WPIAL football championships | TribLIVE.com
News

5 things to watch in Saturday’s WPIAL football championships

Tribune-Review
| Friday, November 16, 2018 6:57 p.m
451085GTRTJMontour11111917
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Thomas Jefferson head coach Bill Cherpak talks with Garret Fairman during the WPIAL Class 4A championship game against Montour Saturday, Nov. 18, 2017, at Heinz Field.

Saturday could be a historic night at Heinz Field for the WPIAL, Thomas Jefferson and coach Bill Cherpak.

If his Jaguars win the WPIAL Class 4A title, Cherpak would tie West Allegheny coach Bob Palko for the most titles in WPIAL history and TJ would become only the third team to win four consecutive WPIAL titles.

Braddock won six WPIAL titles in a row from 1954-59, and Clairton celebrated five straight in 2008-12.

No. 1 seed Thomas Jefferson faces No. 2 South Fayette at 5 p.m. Saturday.

For now, Cherpak is tied with hall of fame New Castle coach Phil Bridenbaugh at seven WPIAL titles, one behind Palko’s record-setting eight. Cherpak’s teams won WPIAL titles in 2004, ’06, ’07, ’08, ’15, ’16 and ’17.

2. More redemption ahead?

Can underdog Seneca Valley complete its “redemption” tour with a victory over Pine-Richland?

The Raiders lost to Central Catholic, North Allegheny and Pine-Richland in the regular season but are eliminating them one at a time in postseason rematches. They defeated Central Catholic, 15-14, in the first round and North Allegheny, 31-14, in the semifinals.

Now, No. 5 seed Seneca Valley faces second-seeded Pine-Richland in the WPIAL Class 6A final. Pine-Richland won the teams’
regular-season contest 21-7 in
Week 8.

3. Long-awaited catfight

No. 2 South Fayette vs. No. 1 Thomas Jefferson is a championship matchup three years in the making.

The two powerhouse programs were also seeded first and second in 2016 and ’17, but South Fayette was upset both years before reaching Heinz Field. The Lions lost a semifinal to Montour last year and were eliminated in the first round by New Castle a year earlier.

South Fayette won WPIAL Class 2A titles in 2010, ’13 and ’14, and was runner-up in ’15. The Lions jumped to Class 4A in ’16 when football expanded to six classes.

4. Offensive opposites

There’s no greater contrast in styles Saturday than in the Class A championship.

Our Lady of the Sacred Heart quarterback Tyler Bradley has thrown 42 touchdowns this season while Rochester quarterback Zaine Jeffers has thrown only 35 passes.

Bradley is the WPIAL’s top passer with 3,059 yards.

What Rochester does very well is run the ball. Running back Noah Whiteleather has 1,913 yards and 26 touchdowns on 254 attempts. The Rams’ only loss was to Big Seven rival OLSH, 37-8, in Week 3.

5. Quips hold historic advantage

For the second year in a row, the Class 3A final matches tradition-rich Aliquippa against an opponent that has a far shorter championship resume.

That didn’t work out well for the Quips a year ago, when Quaker Valley won 2-0 for its first title. This time Derry makes its first WPIAL championship appearance.

Derry has championship experience in its distant history.

Predecessor Derry Township was declared champion in 1930 and was WPIAL runner-up in ’45, but Derry Area hasn’t reached the finals since a 1956 merger.

Chris Harlan is a Tribune-Review staff writer.
You can contact Chris at charlan@tribweb.com
or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.