ShareThis Page
6 convicted in terror plot |

6 convicted in terror plot

Keith B. Richburg
| Wednesday, March 16, 2005 12:00 a.m

PARIS — A French court on Tuesday convicted six French Algerian men of plotting to blow up the U.S. Embassy in Paris with a suicide bombing in the weeks before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the United States.

Djamel Beghal, 39, whom prosecutors called the ringleader, received the maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, and an accomplice, Kamel Daoudi, 30, an engineering and computer specialist who was considered the communications operative, received nine years. The four others received prison terms ranging from one to six years.

According to prosecutors, the attack was to be carried out by a Tunisian former professional soccer player, Nizar Trabelsi. A court in Belgium sentenced Trabelsi to 10 years in prison in 2003 after he confessed to a separate plot to drive a car packed with explosives into a Belgian air base where U.S. nuclear missiles are believed to be stored. Trabelsi denied any involvement in a planned Paris suicide attack.

Prosecutors offered few other details of how the ornate embassy in central Paris would have been targeted. They presented no evidence showing that the men had explosives or such things as maps of the embassy premises.

The six were all convicted of criminal association in relation with a terrorist enterprise, a broad charge that carries a maximum 10-year prison term.

Since 2001, hundreds of suspected Islamic militants have been rounded up in police raids in several European countries, and many remain in custody under anti-terrorism laws that allow for prolonged detentions. But only a handful have been brought to trial or convicted of specific terrorist plots.

Word of a plot against the Paris embassy first came from a confession that Beghal gave in Dubai, where he was arrested in July 2001. He was extradited to France in September 2001, and the official French investigation opened the day before the hijackings in the United States.

Once in France, Beghal retracted the confession, saying it was obtained after “methodical torture.”

During the trial, prosecutors argued that the defendants were Islamic radicals linked to Osama bin Laden’s al- Qaida network and that the plot was conceived in Afghanistan, where Beghal and Daoudi received training in 2000 and 2001. Beghal was said to have ties to the London-based Syrian cleric Abu Qatada, whom Britain has called a spiritual inspiration for the Sept. 11 attacks.

The six men maintained their innocence throughout the trial and said they were only friends, not a terrorist cell. Beghal and Daoudi, who spoke at length during the trial but stood impassively Tuesday with the others as the verdicts were read, have said they were devoutly religious but denied being involved in any terrorist plots.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.