ShareThis Page
7-year term possible for drug lab chemist |

7-year term possible for drug lab chemist

The Associated Press
| Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:33 p.m.

BOSTON — Prosecutors asked that a chemist charged in a far-reaching scandal at a Massachusetts drug-testing lab serve five to seven years in state prison if she pleads guilty in a case that has jeopardized thousands of criminal convictions.

Annie Dookhan has caused “egregious damage” to the state’s criminal justice system, the attorney general’s office wrote in a sentencing memo filed in court on Thursday. A defense lawyer said he would seek a year in jail for his client.

Dookhan is charged with obstruction of justice, perjury and tampering with evidence while working at a former Department of Public Health drug lab. The lab was shut in August 2012 amid a state police investigation of its practices. Since then, at least 1,100 criminal cases have been dismissed or not prosecuted because of tainted evidence or other fallout.

In the sentencing memo, prosecutors from Attorney General Martha Coakley’s office said Dookhan deliberately skipped vital steps in the drug-testing process and ensured that samples sent to the lab by police departments would test positive for drugs to “improve her productivity and burnish her reputation.”

“The gravity of the present case cannot be overstated,” Assistant Attorneys General John Verner and Anne Kaczmarek wrote. “The defendant’s actions not only affected the particular individuals named in the indictments, but also the entire criminal justice system in Massachusetts.”

The memo was filed before a so-called lobby conference on Friday in Suffolk Superior Court in Boston. During the conference, prosecutors and Dookhan’s lawyer, Nicolas Gordon, are expected to meet with Judge Carol Ball to discuss sentencing recommendations if Dookhan were to plead guilty.

Gordon said he plans to recommend a one-year sentence, followed by any amount of probation and whatever conditions the judge imposes. Prosecutors said they would recommend five years of probation.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.