ShareThis Page
800 more Chicago flights canceled |

800 more Chicago flights canceled

From Wire Reports
| Thursday, October 2, 2014 9:36 p.m

CHICAGO — Incoming stormy weather and operational problems caused by a fire last week at a Chicago-area air traffic control facility forced the cancellation of more than 800 flights Thursday at Chicago airports.

More than 525 flights at O’Hare International Airport, one of the world’s busiest, have been canceled, and delays are averaging 45 minutes, according to the city’s department of aviation.

Nearly 300 flights were canceled at Chicago Midway International Airport, and some flight delays were averaging 40 minutes or more. Southwest Airlines, the largest airline serving Midway, canceled all flights after noon.

The National Weather Service said much of the Chicago area would get about an inch of rain from thunderstorms Thursday.

Brian Howard, 36, a field technician, was charged with a federal felony count of destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities for allegedly setting the fire at the Aurora, Ill., facility, prosecutors said. He is being held without bond.

The FAA said technicians were continuing around-the-clock work to restore telecommunications service at the Aurora facility.

Meanwhile, the head of the FAA will visit the damaged regional control center, the agency said.

Administrator Michael Huerta will visit the center and meet with Illinois’ congressional delegation Friday. Huerta has said he hopes to return the facility to full service by Oct. 13.

Huerta has said the FAA is reviewing security at all of its facilities, as well as contingency plans for unexpected events like the fire.

Government and industry officials generally support a program called NextGen, which is intended to update all aspects of flights to boost safety and efficiency, but its costs have risen, funding has been disputed in Congress, and airlines have been slow to adopt the new equipment until the benefits become more obvious.

Huerta says NextGen, budgeted at about $1 billion a year, will reduce flight disruptions by monitoring planes more closely through satellite technology rather than ground-based radar and communicating with them using radio over the Internet.

Watchdogs at the Government Accountability Office and the Transportation Department’s inspector general’s office warned that NextGen is costing more than anticipated and taking longer to implement than expected, while FAA maintains strides are being made.

A 2012 GAO study found half of 30 NextGen projects experienced delays, and 11 of them cost a combined $4.2 billion more than originally estimated. The 11 projects, some of which began in the late 1990s, were originally projected to cost a combined $7 billion and had grown to nearly $11.2 billion, according to GAO.

All told, the FAA plans to spend $4.5 billion on the system by 2035, an increase of $400 million from original estimates, according to the inspector general.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.