ShareThis Page
A dicey return to Iraq |

A dicey return to Iraq

| Sunday, October 26, 2003 12:00 a.m

BAGHDAD – Getting into Iraq has never been easy. These days, it can be quite dicey.

The choices include a mad 14-hour ride through the desert, preyed on by machine-gun-toting bandits, or flying in a small aircraft that corkscrews to a landing.

After making the desert run five times, I thought flying seemed a less harrowing option.

Departing from a small airport in Amman, Jordan, 12 aid workers boarded a 15-seat Beechcraft 1900D operated by Airserv. It’s an airline that regularly flies into combat zones, bravely ferrying equally brave people (such as the aid workers) who try to fix broken places and people.

Before taking off, the pilot announced in a friendly voice that our flight would be a little different than most. The two-propeller plane, he explained, would perform something of an acrobatic feat – a spiral landing – in Baghdad.

The reason, he cheerily continued, is that some nasty people are shooting SAM-7 surface-to-air missiles at anything approaching Baghdad International Airport. “During the Angolan war” – the civil war that has raged, off and on, for decades in that African country – “the only planes hit were those that didn’t spiral in,” the pilot concluded.

Well, then. By all means, spiral away! Becoming toast over Baghdad wasn’t my idea of a good morning.

Missile threat

In recent months, according to the pilot, 28 missiles were fired at planes approaching Baghdad. But “none have hit any planes and none have been shot at for the last few days.”

I felt better already.

We flew at 23,000 feet on a relatively turbulence-free ride until arriving over Baghdad. The little Beechcraft flew right over the airport, then dropped suddenly to 15,000 feet, then began to spiral down to the runway. It banked to the left at a 45-degree angle. Not once, but twice.

A woman across the aisle gritted her teeth so hard that she snapped one off.

After a second pass over the airport, the Beechcraft shifted gears and plunged in the opposite direction, over an emerald-green man-made lake with one of Saddam’s former palaces in the middle. Finally, the plane straightened out and landed.

My stomach flip-flopped as the plane’s wheels hit the ground. Despite the belly-whirl, at least my teeth were intact.

The plane stopped, to the obvious relief of its wild-eyed passengers. The woman across the aisle stared at the broken tooth cupped in one hand.

The Beechcraft’s ever-cheerful pilot merrily announced, “Welcome to Saddam International Airport. Well, that’s what it still says on our flight plan.”

Armed greeting

Soldiers armed with assault rifles pointed the way to the terminal. (Kind of reminded me of Algiers’ airport, another bloody spot, where government troops wore black ninja-like outfits.) We staggered into the newly refurbished building. Until recently passengers were herded through a warehouse at the war-ravaged airport. So, things are improving after all.

Inside, a grinning Iraqi security guard pronounced it “good” that I’m an American.

Surprisingly, Gurkhas also stood guard. The Gurkhas are elite Nepalese soldiers whose predecessors famously fought with the British Army during the heyday of Empire. In recent decades, they’ve made a habit of appearing in trouble-spots like Somalia and, now, Iraq, earning foreign currency as peace-keepers.

Past the Iraqi immigration counter, an American soldier asked passengers if they had anything to declare. “Like what?” one woman asked.

The soldier laughed. “Like any bad stuff.”

There’s already enough bad stuff in Baghdad. Who needs to import more?

Not surprisingly, Baghdad’s airport still has no curbside pickup. Instead, a bus takes you to Checkpoint 1, where, if you’re lucky, a prearranged driver can meet you.

Mine did, taking me on to the home of friends. There, in a small rear walled garden with lemon trees, we were catching up on news when gunfire rang out nearby.

Some things never change in Baghdad.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.