ShareThis Page
A slim win in 18th |

A slim win in 18th

Bill Zlatos
| Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:00 a.m

School administrator Jack Machek edged out the competition in the race for the Democratic nomination for the 18th Congressional District, unofficial results show, setting up a general election showdown with Republican state Sen. Tim Murphy of Upper St. Clair.

Machek said the key to winning in November is to lure Democratic voters his age back to the party.

“A lot of these folks who’ve been switching tickets are my generation, but they’ve been voting Republican because they’ve not trusted recent Democratic nominees to be strong in defending our national interests abroad, to use good middle-class values in our policies at home or to take as little of their tax money as absolutely necessary,” Machek said.

“My job as the nominee is to simply change those perceptions.”

His chief rival, Washington County Sheriff Larry Maggi, conceded defeat shortly before midnight.

Machek, 34, a financial administrator for the Norwin School District, also opposed Bob Domske, 46, a farmer and steelworker, in Tuesday’s primary.

Maggi, 51, of Buffalo Township, is in his second term as sheriff following a 24-year career as a state trooper. Debate in the Democratic primary centered on which of the candidates could best challenge Murphy. A redistricting plan approved by the GOP-controlled Legislature created a district that was tailor-made for the Upper St. Clair Republican, according to political observers.

The district includes much of the South Hills in Allegheny County and large parts of Washington and Westmoreland counties. Although the district has about 75,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans, the region’s recent voting patterns – particularly Murphy’s heavily populated home turf – has favored Republicans.

Machek previously was city manager and community development director in Clairton and federal grants manager with the Private Industry Council of Westmoreland and Fayette counties.

His key campaign issues included support for a federal prescription drug plan for elderly Americans, a strong commitment to national defense – including increased defense spending where needed – and safeguarding the Social Security system.

During the primary, Maggi touted his moderate politics and law-and-order background as assets that should appeal strongly to many of the suburban Democrats that Republicans hope will vote for Murphy in November. Maggi said Republicans have backed him for sheriff in Washington County, which he believes could help.

Maggi, a Marine veteran of the Vietnam War, was endorsed by a number of labor organizations and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. He based his candidacy on what his campaign literature terms a “renowned reputation in law enforcement and no-nonsense leadership style.”

Murphy, 49, is a practicing psychologist who was elected to the state Senate in 1996 and re-elected in 2000. As a legislator, he has stressed health care reform, education improvement and economic development efforts in Pennsylvania.

At his campaign announcement in January, Murphy said Americans are frustrated with government “gridlock” and he wants to be a consensus-builder in Congress. Murphy said he will “work to build a consensus by focusing on families’ needs as opposed to political needs.”

Murphy is married and has one child.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.