A Wolf in pols' clothing |

A Wolf in pols' clothing

Colin McNickle

Let it be stipulated that Tom Wolf is a really nice guy.

He's affable, quick to smile and, seeing his greeter sporting a beard — “I didn't realize you had a beard” — equally quick to share amusing anecdotes about his well-kept facial hair.

Yes, Mr. Wolf, 65, sometimes can be quite wonkish, for which he regularly, and in self-deprecating fashion, seeks humble forgiveness. Still, those periodic lapses into wonk mode are more engaging than overbearing. For he is a serious thinker. Yet there's an understated, almost boyish, enthusiasm that is, well, charming.

But such endearing qualities alone are not qualifications enough to be governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. And despite a still-healthy lead in the polls — one has his lead in the race with Republican Gov. Tom Corbett growing, two others suggest Mr. Corbett is narrowing the gap — there are serious questions about the Democrat gubernatorial nominee, from his policy prescriptions to what kind of leader he would be.

Mr. Wolf, with, to his credit, only his press secretary in tow, visited the Trib last Tuesday for a wide-ranging, nearly 90-minute conversation. And while he has generalized policy prescriptions for a number of top issues that stand out for the wrong reason — that flashing red “Raise taxes!” light comes on — a number of quirky things stand out more, and in troubling fashion.

Some might find it refreshing for a fella running for governor of one of the largest states in the union, when asked a question for which he has no answer, to — GASP! — say he doesn't know enough about a subject. Indeed, too many pols break out the shovel and waddle into the manure pile when faced with a question they shouldn't answer but do.

Wolf, however, pretty much demurred on too wide an array of issues — from online gaming to legislative per diems and from dealing with onerous new federal EPA regulations to the state pension crisis.

But he did throw out a rather startling proposal, “proposal” being a word to be considered loosely because he was more thinking out loud than offering an actual policy.

Asked if he didn't agree with the premise that government shouldn't operate, say, a kitchen cabinet business (the same kind of business on which the Wolf family has built a very profitable enterprise), Wolf didn't see much wrong with the state running a giant liquor business. In fact, he talked of expanding Pennsylvania's existing cluster-cluck of a monopolistic system to supply other states.

Given Pennsylvania's volume buying power, Wolf sees the Keystone State as something of a regional, if not nationwide, liquor broker and reaping a huge windfall. “Pennsylvania, State of Liquor”? Think again.

And then there's Wolf's tap dancing around an odoriferous campaign commercial perpetuating the blatant lie that Tom Corbett cut $1 billion from education spending. Then there's another commercial in which Wolf takes Corbett to task for sticking it to the middle class with his massive increase in the wholesale tax on motor fuels. Wolf's right. But sitting with the Trib, he wasn't about to say he'd work to reverse course.

Tom Wolf, a first-time political candidate, insists he's “new” at the political game. In many regards, he is a novitiate, especially when he naively thinks he'll be able to work well with a General Assembly likely to maintain its Republican majority.

But in regard to so many issues, he's quickly becoming a dodging and weaving political pro. And that's not a very flattering reflection on the bearded, bespectacled and affable fella of York who wants to be Pennsylvania's next governor.

Colin McNickle is Trib Total Media's director of editorial pages (412-320-7836 or [email protected]).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.