Achievement gap narrows in kindergarten |

Achievement gap narrows in kindergarten

Low-income kindergartners are entering school with stronger math and reading skills, narrowing the academic gap with their affluent peers and reversing a decades-old trend, according to research released Friday.

The good news surprised researchers, who had expected to see school-readiness gaps growing — particularly given the broad societal trends of increasing income inequality and economic segregation.

“It’s not like the lives of the rich and the poor have gotten more equal, so we thought the trend of the widening gap would continue,” said Sean Reardon, a Stanford University professor of poverty and inequality in education. He co-authored the study with Ximena Portilla of MDRC, and it was published Friday in AERA Open, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Educational Research Association.

Reardon had previously found that academic achievement gaps grew substantially from the 1970s to 1990s. But he and Portilla found that between 1998 and 2010, academic gaps between low-income and high-income kindergartners shrank between 10 percent and 16 percent. That’s a significant change, but the gap remains large: At the current rate of improvement, it would take between 60 years and 110 years to do away with it.

The gap between white and Hispanic kindergartners narrowed 14 percent, and the gap between white and black kindergartners appeared to narrow somewhat, but the margin of error was too large to say for sure.

So what explains the narrowing gaps?

It might be that the nation’s increasing focus on and investments in early childhood education have given more low-income children a chance to go to preschool, Reardon said. But the data on that are conflicting and inconclusive, he said.

What does seem clear is that low-income parents are spending more time reading with their children and taking them to enriching places like museums, zoos and libraries. Low-income families also have more books and computers at home than they once did — closing a different kind of gap with affluent families, according to a separate study also published Friday in AERA Open and written by Reardon and several other scholars.

“The big increases in those kinds of activities aren’t coming among high-income families, who were already doing them a lot, but among low-income families. So there’s this growing parity … and we know these things are important for school readiness,” Reardon said. He said it seems that public information campaigns about the malleability of young minds and the importance of early literacy are succeeding in helping low-income families understand what they can do at home to prepare their children for school.

But Reardon cautioned that individual parents’ investments of time, energy and money are never going to close the substantial gaps that separate poor and rich kids when they enter kindergarten — and that then persist, leading to enormous achievement gaps throughout elementary school, middle school and high school.

That’s going to take structural changes that attack root problems like income inequality and segregated neighborhoods, he said: “It’s not like we just keep reading to our kids and it’s all going to go away.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.