ACLU lawsuit says Allegheny County denied foster care payment to Leechburg woman |

ACLU lawsuit says Allegheny County denied foster care payment to Leechburg woman

The American Civil Liberties Union said in a federal lawsuit filed Wednesday that an Allegheny County agency illegally denied a Leechburg woman foster care payments and other support for the past two years because the four children she’s taking care of are related to her.

Federal and state law requires the Office of Children, Youth and Families to treat foster parents who are relatives of abused and neglected children the same as they treat other foster families, said Reggie Shuford, executive director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania.

“Finding kind-hearted family members doesn’t relieve child welfare agencies of their obligations to provide support,” he said.

Tracy Schaeffer has been caring for three grandnieces and a grandnephew, all younger than 13, since early 2012, when their drug-addicted parents could no longer care for them, the lawsuit says.

She has repeatedly asked the office for help, but agency employees have refused to provide legal, financial or any other support, the lawsuit says. The office also ignored state and federal laws requiring it to tell Schaeffer that she was eligible to become a certified foster parent and receive financial assistance, the lawsuit says.

“I have done everything in my power to restore normalcy to these beautiful children’s lives, but providing for four young children isn’t cheap, and I have had to go into debt to do it,” Schaeffer said.

County spokeswoman Amie Downs declined to comment.

Brian Bowling is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-325-4301 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.