ShareThis Page
Adams appreciation |

Adams appreciation

Mark Kanny
| Thursday, May 12, 2005 12:00 a.m

Leila Josefowicz was in the midst of one life-altering experience — pregnancy — when she began another project that also changed her life — learning the Violin Concerto by John Adams, with which she will make her Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra debut this weekend.

The 27-year old Canadian violinist first came to prominence more than a decade ago. She was finishing her studies at the Curtis Institute of Music in Philadelphia when she made her first commercial recording in 1994 with Neville Marriner and the Academy of St. Martin-in-the-Fields for Philips Classics.

“Adams plays with tonality in some ways, but it’s the way he plays with rhythm and how he texturizes the orchestra that is really unique.”

Josefowicz says learning the piece during pregnancy was beneficial “because it was a good time focus on something. I try to memorize all the pieces I love in new music” to convey the same commitment she brings to music by masters such as Ludwig van Beethoven.

Among her performances of Adams’ Concerto was with her teacher from Curtis, Jamie Laredo, conducting the Vermont Symphony. She says Laredo told the composer he had to hear her play his music.

Josefowicz was overwhelmed upon meeting Adams.

“He’s such an amazing person, such a wonderful man. After that, my diary became just filled with all kinds of performances with Adams conducting,” she says. “It was an instant profound friendship that formed.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.