Additional funding provided for Mon-Fayette Expressway |

Additional funding provided for Mon-Fayette Expressway

Turnpike Commission bond refinancing and savings on projects will provide about $250 million to push along construction of the Uniontown-to-Brownsville section of the Mon-Fayette Expressway, according to state Sen. Richard Kasunic.

“This is great news and will provide concrete evidence that the project is ready to roll,” Kasunic said in a news release.

The 15-mile section is in the final design and property acquisition phase. Although construction isn’t slated to begin for 18 to 24 months, the section is next in line to tap into construction funds.

Kasunic said turnpike officials have assured him the Uniontown-to-Brownsville section is the priority. The Dunbar Township Democrat predicted construction bids would be accepted in late 2005 and early 2006.

The remaining proposed section of the Mon-Fayette Expressway from Route 51 to the Parkway East into Pittsburgh is several years behind the Uniontown-to-Brownsville section, according to Joe Agnello, a Turnpike Commission spokesman.

The Uniontown-to-Brownsville section, which nearly parallels Route 40, includes a proposed new bridge to span the Monongahela River between Luzerne Township, Fayette County, and Centerville, Washington County.

The dream of a superhighway from Morgantown to Pittsburgh to spur economic development in Fayette County and the Mon Valley dates back more than 50 years.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.