Woodland Hills principal calls for unity in letter to parents |

Woodland Hills principal calls for unity in letter to parents

Ben Schmitt
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Kevin Murray, as seen Dec. 6, 2016.

The principal of Woodland Hills High School sent a letter to parents this week saying the community is splintered and needs to come together in the midst of controversies involving altercations between white school officials and black students.

“The emotional climate of Woodland Hills is not ideal right now, and I am not sure that it ever has been,” Principal Kevin Murray wrote. “It feels like we are becoming more and more broken as time passes, becoming a community where it’s easier to pick apart our differences rather than to celebrate them.”

Murray, who became embroiled in controversy this school year over an audio recording of him threatening a student, called for an end to finger-pointing.

“We have to work together through our differences, our stereotypes, and our prejudices to continuously build up this community that allows itself to be torn down all too often,” he wrote.

Several parents contacted the Tribune-Review on Friday after receiving copies of the letter in the mail.

Earlier this week, Pittsburgh attorney Todd Hollis went public with videos from school surveillance cameras that showed the arrests of two black students, ages 14 and 15, by a white Churchill police officer assigned to the school.

In a video from April 3, Churchill officer Steve Shaulis can be seen dragging Que’chawn Wade, 14, into the school’s main office lobby before fighting with him off camera and knocking out one of the teen’s teeth, Hollis said. Wade faces a resisting arrest charge in juvenile court.

Video from a March 2015 incident shows Shaulis putting Ahmad Williams Jr., then 15, in a headlock, slamming him to the ground and shocking him twice with a Taser. Murray helped hold the teen down during the arrest for disorderly conduct. A judge acquitted Williams of resisting arrest after the tape was played at trial.

Administrators placed Murray on leave Nov. 30 after an audio tape of him threatening a special-education student surfaced. Murray did not report to the school for about six weeks while the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office investigated. In a letter to school officials, District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. called Murray’s actions “inappropriate and arguably threatening,” but he did not recommend criminal charges against Murray.

Hollis declined to comment on the letter Friday.

Murray did not directly acknowledge responsibility for any of the past incidents in his letter, which was signed by Murray and other school staffers.

“We need to take a look in the mirror and ask ourselves, ‘Where did WE go wrong?’, ‘What can WE do better?’ and ‘How can WE be the best versions of ourselves for OUR children?'” the letter said.

Murray asked parents to travel back 30 years to when the Woodland Hills School District was formed under controversial circumstances. Woodland Hills is the product of a court-ordered merger of a large, predominantly black district with four predominantly white ones in the eastern suburbs in 1981. Today’s district includes 12 communities.

“We may have gone wrong from time to time, but we have gotten it right so many more times than credit is given,” he wrote. “I and the staff of Woodland Hills Junior/Senior High School believe that WE can continue to do better and that WE can be the best versions of ourselves for OUR children. Won’t you join us?”

Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991, [email protected] or via Twitter at @Bencschmitt.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.