ShareThis Page
Peduto cruises to big win in Pittsburgh’s mayoral primary |

Peduto cruises to big win in Pittsburgh’s mayoral primary

Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Mayor Bill Peduto greets guests at his victory party at The Boiler Room after winning the mayoral primary on May 16, 2017. (Trib photo)
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Mayor Bill Peduto greets guests at his victory party at The Boiler Room after winning the mayoral primary on May 16, 2017.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto in May 2017.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Mayor Bill Peduto speaks to the media at his victory party at The Boiler Room after winning the mayoral primary on May 16, 2017.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald greets guests at a victory party at The Boiler Room after Mayor Peduto won the mayoral primary on May 16, 2017.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto, front, with Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto has said he is committed to ending investment in fossil fuel-related companies.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Mayor Bill Peduto speaks to the media at his victory party at The Boiler Room after winning the mayoral primary on May 16, 2017.
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto (middle) talks with Guy Costa, Pittsburgh's chief operations officer, and Pittsburgh Public Schools board member Lynda Wrenn, after Peduto voted at St. Bede's Parish in Point Breeze on Tuesday, May 16, 2017.

Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto cruised Tuesday to one of the most lopsided Democratic primary wins in decades, trouncing his biggest political adversary on City Council and a clergyman to earn his party’s nomination, unofficial tallies show.

With 100 percent of the city’s precincts reporting, Peduto collected 68.9 percent of the votes cast, compared with 17.5 percent for the Rev. John C. Welch, 56, of Homewood and 13.2 for City Councilwoman Darlene Harris, 64, of Spring Hill.

In his victory speech to more than 100 supporters in Banksville, Peduto referred to the resounding win as a mandate to press forward with an agenda to “reform city government, rebuild the economy, invest in our neighborhoods and invest in our people.”

While Peduto’s administration pursued numerous initiatives related to those issues over the past three-plus years, he said, “It’s time to take on even bigger challenges.”

The win appears to be among the largest for a contested mayoral candidate in the city’s Democratic primary since at least 1993, when then-state Rep. Tom Murphy collected 71.9 percent of the votes cast to soundly defeat then-City Councilman Jack Wagner.

Wagner, who later became a state senator and Pennsylvania’s auditor general, also came up short in a mayoral bid four years ago. Peduto beat Wagner by 12 percentage points.

Tuesday’s win virtually assures a second term for Peduto, a former city councilman who has been active in politics since his 20s. No Republicans were on the primary ballot. Even if there were, Pittsburgh voters haven’t elected a Republican mayor since the Great Depression.

Peduto held his election party at the Boiler Room banquet facility in Banksville. It was a relatively low-key affair even as Peduto ran away with the race. Just before 10 p.m., more than 50 people gathered at tables in the main banquet hall waiting for Peduto to speak while dozens of others mingled in an adjacent room with a bar and on an outdoor patio.

Around the same time, Harris said she called Peduto to congratulate him.

“It’s just a race. It’s done,” Harris said. “Now we’re going to move on to a new chapter and continue working to make Pittsburgh a better city. I’m grateful for the support of my fellow real Pittsburghers.”

Welch said he felt he made a “respectable showing” for a first-time political candidate running against an incumbent.

“Pittsburgh has not heard the last of John C. Welch,” Welch said.

“I brought to light a number of issues during the campaign, and I’m going to continue to speak to these issues,” Welch said. “I think we can move in new directions without leaving people behind.”

Although an incumbent mayor seeking re-election hasn’t lost in the city’s modern political history, Peduto didn’t appear to take anything for granted in his bid for a second term.

Campaign finance reports filed this month showed that Peduto’s campaign spent more than $600,000 through the first four months of the year — more than 15 times as much money as Harris and Welch combined.

In debates and other public appearances, Peduto focused on detailing his accomplishments and plans for the future and avoided criticizing his opponents or questioning their proposals.

Harris, who has served on City Council since 2006 and previously sat on the Pittsburgh Public Schools board, did little but criticize Peduto’s performance during his first term as mayor, reserving particular disdain for his support of expanding the city’s network of bicycle lanes.

Welch, a city police chaplain who is dean of students for the Pittsburgh Theological Seminary, has been critical of the mayor’s handling of turmoil surrounding the Pittsburgh Water & Sewer Authority and argued that more needs to be done to improve police-community relations.

Tom Fontaine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7847, or via Twitter at @FontainePGH.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.