Archive

ShareThis Page
Allegheny County settles with Air Force veteran who lost job while deployed | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Allegheny County settles with Air Force veteran who lost job while deployed

Tribune-Review
| Friday, June 30, 2017 9:38 p.m
ptrwingard0207017
A campaign Facebook page for Barry Wingard included this photo, with a comment that says, 'Getting to work in Baghdad, Iraq,' as part of his 2016 district judge campaign.
ptrwingard070117
Barry Wingard ran for district judge in 2016.
ptrwingard0207017
A campaign Facebook page for Barry Wingard included this photo, with a comment that says, 'Getting to work in Baghdad, Iraq,' as part of his 2016 district judge campaign.
ptrwingard070117
Barry Wingard ran for district judge in 2016.

Allegheny County paid a $110,000 settlement to a county public defender who returned from a U.S. Air Force deployment in 2013 to find that he no longer had a job.

Barry Wingard, 51, of Indiana Township filed a federal lawsuit against the county in December 2015. Federal law requires employers to hold open jobs for military personnel on deployment for up to five years.

Wingard began working for the county in 2001 as a public defender. He previously worked for the county in the mid-1990s.

In July 2008, he was called to active duty to serve in Operation Enduring Freedom as an attorney in the Judge Advocate General Corps.

When Wingard, a lieutenant colonel, returned from deployment in September 2013, county officials told him his job had been filled because he was gone longer than five years, the complaint says.

Wingard had been away five years and two months.

The requirement does not apply to Wingard, however, the complaint said, because of a provision in the law that exempts “servicemen who are ordered to or retained on active duty … under any provision of law because of a war or national emergency declared by the President or the Congress, as determined by the Secretary concerned.”

In October 2014, Wingard retired from the Air Force, and the county rehired him, but said he had been on “unauthorized leave” for all of 2014, docked his pay for taking days off for which he had not been eligible, and reduced his retirement seniority, the complaint said. Wingard’s 2017 salary is $59,554 a year. In 2016, Wingard ran unsuccessfully to be a district judge in the Fox Chapel area.

When he filed the lawsuit, he said he had not been granted the 50 sick days, 20 vacation days and three personal days he had accrued by 2008.

The settlement agreement says the county will reinstate 27 sick days and 16 vacation days, and credit his pension for the years he was deployed.

Wingard’s attorney, Sam Cordes, said he could not discuss the case because of a confidentiality agreement.

Allegheny County officials did not provide a comment by publication time.

The county paid $51,200 to Wingard and $58,799 in attorney fees.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, tclift@tribweb.com or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.