ShareThis Page
Syrian troops seize border with Jordan, rebels reach deal with Russia |

Syrian troops seize border with Jordan, rebels reach deal with Russia

AFP/Getty Images
The Syrian border control building can be seen from the Jordanian Marfaq governate at the Nassib crossing between the two countries on June 7, 2018.
AFP/Getty Images
A convoy of Syrian military vehicles can be seen from the Jordanian Marfaq governate at the Nassib border between the two countries on June 7, 2018.
AFP/Getty Images
Jordanians watch as smoke rises above the southern Syrian province of Deraa from the Jordanian side of the Nassib border on June 7, 2018.

BEIRUT — Syrian government forces have taken over the southern Nassib crossing on the border with Jordan as rebels agreed to give up their weapons in a deal with Russia, marking a major victory for Syrian President Bashar Assad.

The Syrian flag has been hoisted at the crossing, the country’s main link to Jordan, Syria’s state SANA news agency said.

Syrian television showed footage of government tanks moving toward the crossing, which rebels seized from Syrian forces in April 2015. According to an activist in the area, Russian military police accompanied Syrian troops toward the crossing.

Nassib is a strategic crossing for Syria and Jordan.

Friday’s reported takeover comes after rebels announced reaching a deal with Russia, an ally of the Syrian government, aimed at ending a devastating government campaign in the province of Daraa in southern Syria.

Assad’s forces, backed by allied Russia, started a massive ground and air offensive in mid-July to retake Daraa, the cradle of the 2011 uprising against his rule.

The rebels agreed with Russian military officers on a gradual handover of their weapons and the deployment of Russian military police in Daraa near the Jordanian border, said Ibrahim Jabbawi, a spokesman for the rebel Central Command in southern Syria.

“The agreement includes a cessation of hostilities by both sides,” he added, without saying when the reported deal would go into effect.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a war monitor, reported that both sides agreed on an immediate and full cease-fire in the area.

The rebels will surrender their heavy weapons in exchange for the partial withdrawal of government forces from the area, the observatory added.

Opposition sources told dpa that the deal would allow civilians to return to their villages and towns, with Moscow securing their safety and protection.

The sources added that rebels who did not wish to stay in Daraa would be allowed to leave with their light weapons to areas controlled by Turkish-backed rebels in northern Syria.

Fighters who wish to remain in the province will be assured by Russia that the government will not target them, especially those wanted for military service.

There was no official confirmation by Damascus or Moscow.

“The rebels by leaving Daraa would be losing one of their last strongholds in Syria,” Rami Abdel Rahman, head of the Observatory, told dpa.

A member of the Free Syrian Army in southern Syria, who requested anonymity, rejected accusations that rebels accepted “a surrenderist deal” worked out by the Russians, but stressed that the deal was to avoid more bloodshed and protect civilians.

More than 320,000 people have fled the attacks by Syrian government forces and Russia, and were forced to camp in open spaces or makeshift shelters near the border with Jordan or the Golan Heights.

Meanwhile, in eastern Syria a booby-trapped car exploded late Friday in the village of al Basira, in the eastern countryside of Deir al Zour, which is controlled by U.S.-backed Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, or SDF.

According to the Observatory at least 18 people were killed in the blast, among them seven civilians and 11 SDF fighters. An SDF commander was also among the dead.

Kurdish sources said Islamic State militants were behind the blast.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.