Advancing STEM excellence |

Advancing STEM excellence

We are grateful to the Tribune-Review for shining a light on the importance of STEM education with Friday’s article “Catholic schools gather to discuss STEM program.”

We laud the group of parochial schools participating in our Carnegie STEM Excellence Pathway, joining an additional 7,000 participating schools in 17 states and the District of Columbia, serving 3.9 million students.

The Carnegie STEM Excellence Pathway is a process of continuous improvement guiding diverse schools — both well-resourced and under-resourced — on how best to address the challenge of strengthening their STEM programming. The Pathway is open to any school district in the nation with a drive to improve STEM education.

A foundation in STEM – science, technology, engineering, and math – education is crucial for today’s learners and for our future. Providing strong STEM education means taking an interdisciplinary approach to these subjects through inquiry-based teaching strategies, project-based learning, and career awareness.

St. Joseph High School Principal Beverly Kaniecki said it well: “We want our students thinking on their feet rather than memorizing a list of questions and answers.”

Indeed, STEM education is rooted in what we call “essential skills” — teamwork, problem-solving, communication, critical thinking, and creativity. STEM is not just for scientists and mathematicians – it’s for all of us to understand the evolving world in which we live. STEM is for all.

Ann M. Metzger and Ronald J. Baillie

The Henry Buhl Jr. co-directors, Carnegie Science Center

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.