ShareThis Page
Advice about ‘zoned-out’ boy is revised |

Advice about ‘zoned-out’ boy is revised

John Rosemond
| Tuesday, April 1, 2008 12:00 a.m

Stop the presses. In my column of two weeks ago, I answered a question from the mother of a first-grade boy who frequently “zoned out” in class, the result being he rarely finished classwork. I recommended that Mom have her son bring incomplete work home and finish it there with the understanding that every paper brought home (that should have been finished in class) results in bedtime being moved back a half-hour. I’ve recommended that same strategy many times, and feedback has been almost universally positive.

Not this time. Several readers, including one physician, an internist, wrote to say that the child might be experiencing what is known as “absence” or “silent seizures.” My inquiring mind did some research and, sure enough, that is a possibility. So, I encourage the mom in question as well as any parent whose child is “zoning out” periodically, especially in the middle of tasks, to have the child evaluated by his or her pediatrician or a pediatric neurologist.

I feel moved to mention that the internal physician above wrote “Shame on you.” With due respect, I don’t accept that I should feel ashamed.

Every column I write is read before publication by at least one pediatrician.

To date, I have yet to receive a letter concerning this particular column from any pediatricians or neurologists. It would appear, therefore, that this problem is rare. So I am correcting the oversight absent feelings of disgrace.

Question: My 10-year-old son wrote an autobiographical poem as a school assignment. The assignment was to write about what he dreams, wants and fears. He wrote, in part, “Dreams I get killed by aliens…dreams I was never born…wants to die…wonders how life will turn out…afraid of death…afraid of life.”

The rest was about the son I know “who loves mac and cheese, card games, books and my imagination.” When I asked about the poem, he cried and said life is made up of good and bad, and the bad dominates. He was upset and could not further articulate his thoughts. Several days later, it seems the poem is long over and done with in his mind; however, I remain scared by his words about dying.

He is smart, creative, articulate, and, I think, cautiously happy in general. Thank you for any advice.

Answer: Your son’s obviously a very sensitive boy. He’s also, by his own admission, quite imaginative. Furthermore, his capacity for abstract thought is enlarging significantly at this age and will continue to do so for the next few years. To put it simply, he’s beginning to lose his sense of innocence about the world. The confluence of these factors will cause him, at times, to ruminate on negative events, thoughts and feelings. The writing exercise just brought lots of this to the surface. In one sense, it gave him a healthy outlet for expressing things that are disturbing and worrisome.

The bottom line is, I don’t think this episode means there’s something psychologically “wrong” with him. He’s growing up, and that entails coming to grips with new ideas and emotions, some of which, as all adults know, are not pleasant. Be careful not to make a big deal of things of this nature. He already has demonstrated that he “rebounds” from these sorts of feelings quite functionally. Asking him whether he wants to talk about his feelings is one thing; acting anxious about them is quite another. At this time in his life, the last thing he needs is a mom who’s worrying about him.

John Rosemond is a family psychologist.

Visit family psychologist John Rosemond’s website; readers may send him email; due to the volume of mail, not every question will be answered.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.