AFL-CIO backs mechanics on Airbus work |

AFL-CIO backs mechanics on Airbus work

In their fight to maintain Airbuses, US Airways aircraft mechanics got a boost from the AFL-CIO on Wednesday.

The union’s Transportation Trades Department passed a resolution supporting the aircraft mechanics, including pressuring Congress to protect US Airways workers’ jobs lost from outsourcing.

“US Airways’ plans to contract out the repair of its Airbus planes to a Singapore-based company — a callous disregard of its contract with its workers — is part of a growing and damaging trend in today’s economy,” said AFL-CIO President John Sweeney.

The union claims the airline is going to outsource Airbus jet overhauls to Mobile Aeropace Engineering, of Mobil, Ala. It is owned by VT Systems Inc., which is owned by Singapore Technologies Engineering, said a spokeswoman, who declined to comment about Airbus maintenance.

But US Airways spokesman Dave Castelveter said no decision had yet been made.

US Airways is choosing between its unionized mechanics and a third party to perform Airbus heavy maintenance, such as overhauling engines and major components. Some of the European-made jets are coming due for heavy-maintenance checks next month.

The International Association of Machinists represents nearly 2,000 aircraft mechanics based at Pittsburgh International Airport. They and mechanics at other US Airways hubs perform light maintenance on Airbuses, such as fuel-line checks, but not heavy maintenance.

Selection of a third party would yield a major contract dispute, the machinist union claims, which could produce a strike. The airline claims the differences represent a contract interpretation that’s resolvable through arbitration.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.