Archive

ShareThis Page
After investigation, Navy lowers ‘American Sniper’ Chris Kyle’s medal count | TribLIVE.com
News

After investigation, Navy lowers ‘American Sniper’ Chris Kyle’s medal count

Tribune-Review
| Saturday, July 9, 2016 11:00 p.m

After an investigation into famed SEAL Chris Kyle’s personnel record, the Navy has corrected his medal count, indicating that he earned one Silver Star instead of his previously claimed two, a Navy spokeswoman said Saturday.

Kyle, who was murdered along with a friend in 2013, penned the book “American Sniper” which was subsequently turned into a movie by director Clint Eastwood. In his book, Kyle wrote that he had earned two Silver Stars, a prestigious valor award two rungs below the Medal of Honor. When Kyle left the Navy in 2009, his separation form — known as DD214 — also said that he had earned the two Silver Stars.

On June 14, the Navy updated his DD214 with the correct medal count. USA Today was the first to report on Kyle’s altered record Friday.

Kyle’s veracity has come under scrutiny before. In his book, Kyle claimed to have shot at rioters from atop the New Orleans’ Superdome in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and later said on late night television that he had punched former Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura in the face. Ventura took Kyle’s estate to court in a defamation lawsuit and won. A jury awarded the “Predator” co-star $1.8 million in 2014.

What isn’t in doubt, however, is Kyle’s performance on the battlefield. His record notes that besides his one Silver Star, he earned four Bronze Stars with “V” for valor distinguishing devices and a Navy Achievement Medal with a “V” during his time fighting in Iraq.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.