ShareThis Page
Agencies look at disposing dredged silt from Cuyahoga River in Ohio |

Agencies look at disposing dredged silt from Cuyahoga River in Ohio

The Associated Press

CLEVELAND — Ohio’s environmental regulators and a federal agency that maintains Lake Erie’s shipping channels have started talking about new ways to get rid of all the sediment that is dredged out of the Cuyahoga River.

Officials from the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers met last week to hash out ideas about the dredging.

The two agencies disagree about whether sediment from the river should be dumped in Lake Erie.

Environmental groups, state regulators and political leaders have been trying to stop the dumping since the 1980s. But the Army Corps has resisted, saying it’s safe and much cheaper to put it into the lake.

Early this year, the Army Corps was pushing to start taking dredged sediment from the Cuyahoga River and Cleveland harbor and disposing of it offshore. But the Ohio EPA objected and the Army Corps backed off the idea, saying it would continue to put the sediment in a contained disposal facility.

Officials from the two agencies along with those from the Port of Cleveland met of Friday Republican Rep. Bob Gibbs of Ohio to discuss how to solve the issue.

Gibbs, chairman of the House Transportation Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, told The Plain Dealer that the participants came up with some potential solutions that would protect jobs and the water quality in Lake Erie.

“I think we are making progress,” he said. “Sometimes it is good to get everyone together, face to face.”

Ohio EPA officials said they would be willing to pay for some of the extra costs of continuing to put sediment in the disposal facility, Gibbs said. The goal is to come up with a plan to handle the dredged material for the next 20 years, he said.

“We are looking for both a short-term solution for 2015 and a long-term solution that would keep the channel open and prevent the dredge material from going into the open lake,” said Heidi Griesmer, a spokeswoman with the Ohio EPA.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.