ShareThis Page
Agency OKs loan for arena overrun |

Agency OKs loan for arena overrun

| Wednesday, November 26, 2008 12:00 p.m

The Allegheny County Redevelopment Authority authorized a $2.75 million loan Tuesday that could help cover higher-than-expected costs of Pittsburgh’s multipurpose arena.

The total cost of the arena is $321 million, up from $290 million when city, county and state officials announced a deal in March 2007 to keep the Penguins in Pittsburgh by building an arena to replace Mellon Arena, the National Hockey League’s oldest venue.

The city-county Sports & Exhibition Authority agreed Nov. 13 to contribute $5.5 million to the $31 million increase in the cost of the arena. The state will contribute $10 million and the Penguins will pay $15.5 million.

Dennis Davin, the redevelopment authority’s executive director, said the loan would be repaid with proceeds from the sale of land at Mellon Arena, which is to be demolished.

Davin said Pittsburgh’s Urban Redevelopment Authority also has been asked to grant a $2.75 million loan to the SEA. A decision on that loan likely will be made next month.

SEA Executive Director Mary Conturo said the loans will be used to cover the SEA’s share only if the authority cannot save money from reducing the price of building an arena parking garage or generate extra adequate revenue from a hockey ticket surcharge.

The arena is set to open for the 2010-11 hockey season.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.