ShareThis Page
Air quality hearing set on Harrison steel mill |

Air quality hearing set on Harrison steel mill

| Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:00 a.m

The Allegheny County Health Department will hold a hearing on an emissions permit for the installation of ATI-Allegheny Ludlum’s new steel processing plant in Harrison.

The specialty steelmaker’s anticipated $1.2 billion hot strip mill project is under way as the company is demolishing 26 structures to prepare the site for the new building. The steel mill is formally known as the Brackenridge Works, although all but a small sliver is in Harrison.

The steelmaker has not announced a construction timetable.

“A review and analysis of projected emissions from the new facility indicates that it will not have a significant impact on air quality in the surrounding areas,” said Bruce Dixon, director of the county health department.

Even so, the Group Against Smog and Pollution, or GASP, of Pittsburgh will comment on its concerns about air quality issues surrounding the plant.

Allegheny Ludlum’s Brackenridge Works is a significant source of fine particle pollution in Allegheny County, according to Joe Osborne, legal director of GASP.

“We’re not opposed to the project,” said Osborne. “We just want to make sure that it is built in the most environmentally responsible way possible and that it incorporates adequate pollution controls.”

Last year, a USA Today report on air quality around the nation’s schools, “Smokestack Effect,” ranked the air quality at Highlands High School, just up the hill from the Ludlum mill, as among the worst in the nation.

Of special concern was the presence of the toxic chemical chromium, one of the compounds that is part of the production of stainless steel, the main product of ATI-Allegheny Ludlum’s Brackenridge Works.

The county health department questioned the newspaper’s findings because of a number of factors, including the short period of time for testing. But the county has since provided more monitoring of the air quality at Highlands High School.

“Given the findings in the USA Today study relating to air quality at Highlands, it’s important that we look at the emissions of toxic metals from Allegheny Ludlum and other nearby facilities,” said Osborne.

“We think additional measures can be implemented at the proposed facility that would improve air quality,” he added.

Additional Information:

Coming up

Who: The Allegheny County Health Department

What: Hearing on emissions permit for new Allegheny Ludlum steel processing plant

When: Thursday, 6 p.m.

Where: VFW, 894 Veterans Lane, Natrona Heights, Harrison

Details: Testimony given at the hearing must be scheduled in advance by calling 412-578-8115 no later than 4 p.m. today.

Additional Information:

To review the plan

The proposed permits are posted on the health department’s Web site , and are also available for review, Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., at the health department’s air quality program office, 301 39th St., in the Lawrenceville section of Pittsburgh.

The health department will take comments from those who are unable to attend the hearing until Nov. 22 via the internet at or regular mail sent to the Allegheny County Health Department, Air Quality Program, 301 39th St., Pittsburgh, PA 15201.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.