ShareThis Page
Airlines facing tough times after Sept. 11 |

Airlines facing tough times after Sept. 11

Vaughn Gilbert has flown twice since Sept. 11 and plans to vacation in Europe next spring.

U.S. Rep. Mike Doyle, a Swissvale Democrat, has returned to the airways more often recently.

“I wanted people to know it was safe to travel in airplanes again,” Doyle said.

US Airways and other carriers could use a lot more people like Gilbert, 48, of Elizabeth Township and the congressman.

The tragedies of Sept. 11 — along with the nation’s economic recession — drained 33 percent of the passengers from nation’s airlines when compared to a year earlier. The Air Transport Association, which crunches data from the major carriers, said October traffic dropped 23 percent.

And airlines are not out of the woods yet. November passenger traffic at US Airways, for instance, was still down 25 percent from a year ago.

“I flew to Los Angeles a couple of weeks after Sept. 11, and the plane was almost empty,” said attorney Dennis Unkovic, 53, of McCandless, who specializes in commercial transactions.

After the terrorist attacks, US Airways’ Chairman Stephen Wolf said the airline faced “challenges of an unimaginable magnitude.” It and other major carriers could lose more than $6 billion this year.

After a more than three-week shut-down, Reagan Washington National Airport — where US Airways holds about half the lucrative shuttle traffic — did not reopen until Oct. 4. And airlines there are still hobbling along at roughly half-capacity.

To build traffic and revenue, Wolf wants more regional jets in order to feed more flyers from small markets to US Airways’ mainl routes. The smaller, regional jets fill a high percentage of their seats, yet fly faster than the propeller planes they would replace.

But the company and its pilots union are still at odds over pay and job security.

Airlines have responded to the lull in traffic by discounting fares. Latest figures show the 15 largest airlines dropped average airfares by more than 19 percent in October.

While a boon to passengers, lower air fares can hurt US Airways’ revenue. The Arlington, Va.-based carrier also cut its flight schedule by 23 percent to match the drop in travel — which reduced operating costs but also cut revenue.

Since Sept. 11, the company has been hoarding its cash. A cushion of $1.5 billion on Sept. 1 dwindled to $1 billion by month-end. US Airways had to mortgage aircraft in late November to fetch $404 million more.

Whether discounts draw enough paying passengers into the sky will depend on attitudes like that of Bob Medonis, a local attorney who plans to fly to Philadelphia in about a month.

Even if they weren’t scared off by Sept. 11, passengers must now be patient. Extra airport security — from I.D. checks to bag and body searches — adds up to two hours to each leg of a trip. Some travelers will stay at home , while others will adjust.

“Westinghouse (Electric Co.) for years has tried to eliminate unnecessary travel,” said Gilbert, the Monroeville company’s spokesman. “But we provide service and refueling for nuclear power plants throughout the world, and our business requires us to travel.”

Westinghouse’s 9,000 workers, including 3,000 in this region, log at least 22,000 flying miles a year. And that globe-trotting didn’t abate much after Sept. 11, said Gilbert.

“I’m not going to let this determine how I live my life,” Gilbert said during a telephone interview on a flight from St. Louis

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.