ShareThis Page
Airport checkpoints collected half a million dollars in loose change in one year |

Airport checkpoints collected half a million dollars in loose change in one year

| Friday, April 12, 2013 6:15 p.m

WASHINGTON — Travelers left more than $500,000 —almost all of it in loose change — at airport checkpoints last year, according to the Transportation Security Administration.

John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, Miami International Airport and O’Hare International Airport in Chicago collected the largest amounts. But even airports in smaller cities such as Pensacola, Fla., Des Moines, Iowa, and Reno, Nev., each emptied at least $1,000 from the plastic tubs passengers use prior to walking through metal detectors.

TSA’s Unclaimed Money at Airports survey tracks federal fiscal years, which start Oct. 1 and end Sept. 30. The agency issued its annual survey this month amid debate over what to do with the abandoned loot.

The take for fiscal 2012 (including foreign coins) was $531,392.22, an increase of about 9 percent over fiscal 2011 ($487,869.50) and about 30 percent over fiscal 2010 ($409,085.56). The total collected over the three fiscal years was $1.43 million.

Travel experts say people leave money behind for a variety of reasons.

They might be rushing through a checkpoint or heading to a country where they may have little use for U.S. currency.

The abandoned change is spent on civil aviation security, as prescribed by Congress.

As of March 31, TSA had spent $6,539.94 of the change collected in fiscal 2012 on translating airport checkpoint signage into foreign languages and “other administrative overhead,” according to the report.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.