Alcohol’s role in collegiate assaults cited at University of Virginia board’s meeting |

Alcohol’s role in collegiate assaults cited at University of Virginia board’s meeting

The Associated Press

CHARLOTTESVILLE — A University of Virginia board on Tuesday honed in on alcohol as a contributing factor in sexual assaults on campus, with one member calling for more aggressively enforcing the law banning underage drinking.

Members of the Board of Visitors discussed sexual assault allegations that came out in a devastating portrait in Rolling Stone that has rocked the campus. The article described a woman’s account of a gang rape and went into detail about what it called a hidden culture of sexual violence at the school.

Board member Bobbie Kilberg said the school needed to stop underage drinking, a tall order on nearly any college campus, where drinking is a rite of passage and students under age 21 have no trouble getting alcohol.

Her suggestion met some resistance from student leaders. Tommy Reid, president of the school’s Inter-Fraternity Council, said such a ban could push drinking “underground.”

Ashley Brown, president of One Less, a sexual assault education group on campus, said that although she opted out of Greek life, “I found my alcohol elsewhere,” and expressed a similar concern about kids getting drunk in cars or concerts.

Last week’s Rolling Stone story went into detail about binge drinking on campus.

Board member L.D. Britt called excessive drinking “the fuel … We have to address that. We cannot push that under the rug. It was the fuel when I was here back in 1968. And it’s the fuel now.”

University President Teresa Sullivan has asked Charlottesville police to investigate the reported gang rape at the Phi Kappa Psi house, and she has said the article contained details previously unknown to officials. At Tuesday’s meeting, Charlottesville Police Chief Timothy J. Longo wouldn’t comment on the investigation but added, “I will say this: There were bystanders. There were people in that room. … I hope that those bystanders have the moral courage to come forward and help us with that investigation.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.