ShareThis Page
Alleged absentee mom faces trial |

Alleged absentee mom faces trial

| Friday, October 21, 2011 12:00 a.m

A Monongahela woman accused of leaving three small children alone faces a trial.

Natasha Ostrander, 26, of 800 E. Main St., is charged with endangering the welfare of children and recklessly endangering another person.

She waived her right to a preliminary hearing Thursday before Magisterial District Judge Mark Wilson in Monongahela.

Ostrander allegedly left her 6-year-old son and 2-year-old daughter home alone the morning of Aug. 27 when her mother, Kimberly Ostrander, 47, of 800 E. Main St., drove her to work, police said.

Kimberly Ostrander’s 3-year-old daughter was also alone at the home at that time, according to an affidavit of probable cause filed with Wilson.

Kimberly Ostrander told police her vehicle struck a utility pole on Route 88 in Carroll Township as she was on her way back to the residence, the affidavit states.

Police said she was driving north on Route 88 when she apparently fell asleep.

Kimberly Ostrander also was charged with endangering the welfare of children and recklessly endangering another person.

Monongahela police went to the Ostranders’ residence while they were away and knocked on the door, but there was no answer, according to the affidavit.

When Carroll Township police Chief Paul Brand arrived at the house with Kimberly Ostrander after the accident, the officers found the three children asleep inside of the residence, the affidavit states.

Natasha Ostrander was arraigned Sept. 28 and taken to Washington County Correctional Facility.

She was released after $5,000 bond.

A warrant has been issued for Kimberly Ostrander, who was also was charged with summary counts of careless driving and driving while operating privilege is suspended or revoked in relation to the accident.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.