ShareThis Page
Alleged robber waives preliminary hearing |

Alleged robber waives preliminary hearing

The Tribune-Review
| Friday, October 5, 2001 12:00 a.m

A Pittsburgh man who allegedly robbed a Somerset County bank and led police on a lengthy chase through Fayette County waived his right to a preliminary hearing Thursday on charges related to the chase.

Brian A. Fisher, 23, of 1112 N. Murtland St., was arrested after ramming a state police cruiser with his truck while driving west in the eastbound lane of U.S. Route 40 on the Summit Mountain, South Union Township.

Fisher allegedly robbed the Promistar Bank in New Centerville Borough on Sept. 5 at 12:02 p.m.

A dog handler who was heading to Somerset County to help track the suspect spotted Fisher in a Ford truck described by police as one involved in the crime.

Bob Vail, a member of the Fayette County Sheriff’s Tactical Search and Rescue Team, turned and followed Fisher’s vehicle toward Uniontown, and phoned police.

When police tried to stop Fisher, he allegedly began driving in excess of 90 mph and crossed into the eastbound lanes to avoid a tire-flattening device that police had laid across the road.

Near a runaway truck ramp, state police Trooper Gerald A. Furajter crossed through an opening in the jersey barriers and was struck by Fisher’s truck.

Fisher later got out of his truck and fled on foot. He was apprehended shortly afterward with cash allegedly stolen from the bank.

He faces charges of aggravated assault, recklessly endangering another person, and fleeing or attempting to elude police.

Joe George Jr., Fayette County first trial assistant district attorney, said charges against Fisher may be moved to Somerset County or to federal court in compliance with a recent decision that mandates crimes arising out of a single criminal episode must be tried only once.

Fisher is being held at the Fayette County Prison in lieu of $100,000 bond.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.