ShareThis Page
Allegheny County detective’s parking of car investigated |

Allegheny County detective’s parking of car investigated

| Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:00 p.m

The Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office is investigating what happened when one of its detectives improperly parked his county car at Pittsburgh police headquarters during the Steelers’ AFC Championship Game and later reported it missing, a spokesman said Wednesday.

Detective Tony Hildebrand, a former city officer, was not on official business Sunday when he parked the car at the lot off Western Avenue in the North Side, spokesman Mike Manko said. Manko said the office was investigating what happened to the car and why it was there.

The car has since been recovered, Manko said.

“We’re in the process of reviewing the situation,” he said. “The policy is that county vehicles are not for personal use.”

Hildebrand could not be reached.

Police spokeswoman Diane Richard said Hildebrand parked the car in the lot and later reported it was gone. She said police turned over the matter to the district attorney’s office.

“The county vehicle was parked in our lower parking lot. When the driver came back to retrieve the vehicle, it was gone. There was a miscommunication with the status of the vehicle, which was not stolen. The vehicle was removed by another county detective,” Richard said.

She referred questions to the district attorney’s office.

Richard said the lower lot at headquarters is primarily for police employee parking and their personal vehicles and visitor parking. The lower lot has restricted parking on game days.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.