ShareThis Page
Alliances in the sky |

Alliances in the sky

| Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:00 a.m

The US Airways-United Airlines alliance that links their flights through a single booking became fully operational on Tuesday — the same day transportation officials threatened to dismantle a competing, three-way pact US Airways dubs the “Outlaw Alliance.”

Pittsburgh passengers also could gain access to about 800 foreign destinations this summer, when US Airways plans to join an international alliance led by United, said a US Airways executive.

“With our entry into the Star Alliance, it should put Pittsburgh on the global platform,” said Brent McNamara, US Airways regional sale director. The Star Alliance consists of United and 16 other major airlines.

The marketing agreement with United currently allows US Airways passengers to fly to 79 more destinations by connecting to United flights without buying additional tickets or rechecking bags. The alliance, which the two airlines struck in late July, had been introduced in stages.

Meanwhile, a similar code-sharing alliance between Delta, Northwest and Continental airlines was rebuked by the U.S. Department of Transportation yesterday.

Officials threatened to have the entire agreement overturned in federal court after the three airlines pursued the alliance without the restrictions that the Transportation Department initially had laid down because too many routes overlapped.

The three major carriers declared they would proceed to implement their plan — without the government conditions — on Jan. 21, prompting US Airways to dub the marketing pact the “Outlaw Alliance.”

Yesterday, Transportation officials reacted to the bravado by vowing to block the entire alliance.

By contrast, the US Airways-United deal flew past regulators because their route networks rarely overlap. United passengers, for instance, will be able to fly to 188 new destinations in the East and the Caribbean by connecting on US Airways flights.

“This provides a plethora of flight combinations,” McNamara said. “It’s a virtual network.”

He also termed as “conservative” initial estimates that the code-sharing agreement with United would mean about $100 million a year in extras revenue for US Airways.

McNamara said US Airways’ admission to the Star Alliance does not require government approvals. It only needs a nod from the alliance members, who stand to gain by effectively extending their route networks through US Airways’ system.

“It creates an opportunity for foreign travelers to come to Pittsburgh, which is important for businesses here and for the Pittsburgh community in general,” McNamara said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.