ShareThis Page
Allies reach Pacific Rim trade deal likely to divide political parties |

Allies reach Pacific Rim trade deal likely to divide political parties

Usa Today
| Monday, October 5, 2015 7:21 p.m

The United States and 11 other Pacific Rim nations struck a tentative trade agreement Monday, a landmark deal that has the potential to transform the global economy, divide political parties in Congress, and roil the American presidential race.

As President Obama and aides began selling the agreement —details of which are not released — to Congress and the public, critics denounced it as another free trade deal that will help ship American jobs overseas.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership will “promote economic growth” and “support higher paying jobs,” said U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman, making the announcement along with other trade ministers in Atlanta to end days of final negotiations.

The huge proposed agreement — which awaits months of debate in Congress — would tie together nearly 40 percent of the world’s economy, from Canada to Chile to Japan to Australia; it would be the largest regional trade agreement in history.

Critics, including Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, said employers will use the agreement to move jobs to poorer countries that have lower wages and fewer regulations.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnnell, R-Ky., the chamber’s top Republican, vowed “intense scrutiny” of the proposed agreement.

Government officials across the Pacific Rim hailed the proposed deal as an advance for the global economy. In Tokyo, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe called it “a major outcome not just for Japan but also for the future of the Asia-Pacific.”

Besides America and Japan, TPP countries are Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Singapore, Australia, Peru, Vietnam, Malaysia, Mexico and Canada. Not included in the deal: China.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.