Ambulance ride ends in charges against Monessen man |

Ambulance ride ends in charges against Monessen man

A Monessen man faces trial on charges that he attacked a police officer and paramedics while they were trying to load him into an ambulance.

Dwayne T. Miller, 35, of 1419 Walnut St., was charged with aggravated assault, simple assault, reckless endangerment and disorderly conduct after the June 7 incident at his residence. He waived his right to a preliminary hearing Friday before District Justice Joseph Dalfonso of Monessen.

Police said they responded to a report of an unresponsive male at Miller’s residence. When they arrived, he apparently was sleeping. The officers revived him, but his speech was slurred and his eyes rolled back into his head.

Miller told police he had taken prescribed medication for a toothache. Mon Valley EMS arrived on scene and police told Miller he would have to go to the hospital to be evaluated.

They put him on a cot for the ambulance ride. Then, police say, Miller began yelling at his wife and tried to break out of the cot’s restraints. The officers and paramedics forced him back onto the cot, and he began to attack them, police said.

He punched one paramedic in the face and broke Monessen Detective Sgt. John Mandarino’s nose, police said.

Miller also is accused of spitting on the officers and paramedics several times during the ride to the hospital.

Miller received a mental health evaluation at the hospital.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.