ShareThis Page
An expensive renovation |

An expensive renovation

Letter To The Editor
| Thursday, July 30, 2015 8:55 p.m

As a Burrell School District taxpayer, I became concerned after reading the story “Burrell considers renovating former weight room” (July 28).

In addition to deciding if this space needs to be converted from a weight room into a locker room, the board needs to consider if it’s a good idea for this space to be renovated period.

Board member Jim Kunkle stated it is “hard to wrap your head around spending as much money on one room as it could cost to build a house.” For $300,000, you could buy a pretty nice house and most homes in Burrell aren’t valued at anything close to that price.

As taxpayers, we should have a say in this type of spending in our school district. I am totally uneasy with the renovation of one room at this exorbitant amount of money.

I wish more people would speak up about situations confronting this community because we ultimately pay the bill.

Patricia Mele

Lower Burrell

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.