ShareThis Page
Analysis: GOP in dicey battle with Obama |

Analysis: GOP in dicey battle with Obama

| Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:21 p.m

WASHINGTON — Under relentless pressure from their right wing, Republicans are in the midst of a risky fight with President Obama they know they will lose, little more than a year before an election that history says they should win.

To minimize the damage, the party must redefine victory as something less than a full defunding of the three-year-old health care law yet convince the most conservative GOP supporters that Republican lawmakers succumbed during a principled fight — all without triggering a government shutdown or a default by the Treasury, or otherwise offending independents whose ballots will settle the 2014 elections.

Party leaders are making that effort.

“I just don’t happen to think filibustering a bill that defunds Obamacare is the best route to defunding Obamacare,” Sen. Mitch McConnell said on Tuesday. “All it does is shut down the government and keep Obamacare funded.”

That was one day after he rejected the path outlined by the party’s rebel-in-chief, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz — who began a speaking marathon on the Senate floor on Tuesday afternoon in which he said politicians in both parties routinely ignore voters’ wishes.

Seeking to turn the heat on to Democrats, McConnell said that four years ago, they voted for the health care law with the “excuse that they didn’t know how it would turn out. Well, they don’t have that excuse now. I think we deserve to know where they stand now.”

Republicans will need to pick up six seats in 2014 to win control of the Senate, a tall hurdle but not impossible. The party out of power in the White House historically has won an average of three or four seats in midterm elections since 1934, and Democrats are defending a half-dozen in difficult circumstances.

In the House, the GOP holds a 233-200 majority with two vacancies, and the historical trends show a 27-seat gain in midterm elections for the party locked out of the White House.

Enter the campaign to defund Obama’s health care overhaul, accompanied by the risk of a shutdown or default.

Democrats, holding a Senate majority and seeking the same in the House, figure that chaos is their friend in this political climate. They calculate that the public will blame Republicans for any interruption in government services or benefits, as it did two decades ago in the last shutdown confrontation that approximates the current one.

Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada routinely refers to them as Tea Party “anarchists.” Speaking over the weekend to the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, Obama was just as pointed.

“This is an interesting thing to ponder, that your top agenda is making sure 20 million people don’t have health insurance,” he said.

Behind the president’s remarks lie Democratic assumptions that the health care law isn’t as unpopular as Republicans say it is.

Cruz and his allies are focused largely on the Tea Party slice of the electorate as they flirt with a partial shutdown — an outcome the Texan says he doesn’t want — in their drive to defund the Affordable Care Act. McConnell and other Republican leaders focus on other soundings. So do Obama and congressional Democrats.

Each finds something to like in a survey by the Pew Research Center.

Among the general population, 33 percent of those surveyed said they want lawmakers to defund Obamacare if it means a government shutdown.

For independents, it is 36 percent, sobering for Republicans whose goal is to win a majority in November. Among Tea Party members, 77 percent said they want to defund Obamacare even if a shutdown results.

That’s enough to give hope to a challenger running against even the most entrenched Republican next fall, and to a potential 2016 GOP presidential candidate as well.

A senator for eight months, Cruz is counted among them, and he has easily eclipsed fellow White House hopefuls Rand Paul and Marco Rubio as the face of the drive to “Defund Obamacare.”

The Texas Republican co-stars with fellow Sen. Mike Lee of Utah in television commercials to promote the cause. The ads are funded by the Senate Conservatives Fund, one of a cluster of organizations that makes a specialty of backing Tea Party-aligned challengers in congressional primaries.

Some Tea Party-backed challengers, including Cruz, Paul and Rubio, have won Senate seats in recent years by defeating incumbents or establishment-backed candidates. But the list of those who won nominations only to lose elections that were clearly winnable is longer, in Nevada, Colorado, Delaware, Missouri and Indiana — long enough to have cost Republicans chances at winning the majority in 2010 and 2012, and threaten any chance they have in 2014 as well.

David Espo is the chief congressional correspondent for The Associated Press.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.