Analysis: Outcome puts Obama at crossroads |

Analysis: Outcome puts Obama at crossroads

WASHINGTON — As he turns to the 2012 presidential campaign that kicks in Wednesday, a battered President Obama needs to address two glaring vulnerabilities laid bare by the midterm elections: how to fix the economy and rebuild the voting coalition that put him in power.

Inside the White House, aides are making determined preparations to thwart the Republican goal of making him a one-term president.

Look, early on, for a shift in rhetoric as the first step in a broad effort to court independent voters, who Obama carried by 8 points in 2008. Independents have since soured on his leadership, unnerved by the deficits, stimulus and bailout packages that the White House said were essential to avoiding a full-fledged depression.

Obama campaigned for president on a message of hope and inclusiveness, but as he tried to rally Democratic voters this fall, he resorted to harsh campaign language. By the end, he was referring to Republicans as “enemies” and insisting that they take a “back seat” to Democrats.

He needs to recapture the bipartisan voice that got him elected in the first place, some of his supporters say.

“In going into such partisan, harsh, class-oriented and divisive rhetoric, he’s given up the magic of his candidacy,” is the tough assessment of Lanny Davis, who was counsel to former President Bill Clinton and who counts himself an Obama admirer. “This is what he has lost. And I don’t mean diminished; I mean lost. It’s tragic.”

Obama’s first chance to display that new tone happens today with his post-election news conference in the East Room.

Fixing the economy will be a lot tougher. The public wants to see a spurt of job growth: Exit polls taken Tuesday showed that voters were most worried about the economy, with other issues far down the list.

If the economy remains sluggish, “he’s going to have trouble,” said Andrew Kohut, president of the Pew Research Center.

But, on the jobs front, Obama’s options are limited. The president has no control over monetary policy and there is little appetite in Congress for additional government spending that would ratchet up a soaring budget deficit.

So Obama is left to hope that the gradual recovery and modest private sector job growth continue, allowing unemployment to fall over the next two years.

Even if the economy is slow to recover, Obama will have a chance next month to temper perceptions of him as a classic Democratic tax-and-spender and position himself so he doesn’t shoulder all the blame for the economy. That’s when a bipartisan commission will recommend ways to reduce the deficit. By embracing the panel’s work, Obama can stake out a position favored by the independents and fiscally conservative Democrats who have abandoned him over the past 22 months.

While Obama has been weakened, he has some things working in his favor.

One is history. At the same point in his presidency, Clinton enjoyed an unemployment rate of only 5.6 percent, yet his Gallup Poll approval rating was 46 percent — about the same as Obama’s today. And Clinton, of course, went on to win re-election. Same with Ronald Reagan. Unemployment was even higher in 1982 than it is now, yet two years later Reagan won re-election in a landslide — though by that point the jobless rate had fallen to about 7 percent.

Another is the current state of the Republican Party. White House aides say that with the Tea Party ascendant, Republicans are on a path to nominating an extremist candidate who would be easy to beat in a general election matchup against Obama.

“The Republicans right now are a pretty good midterm party, but they are a disastrous presidential party,” said a senior White House aide, who asked not to be identified in order to speak candidly.

“The folks now in charge of the nominating process in the Republican Party are the same people who produced Sharron Angle (Nevada), Christine O’Donnell (Delaware), Ken Buck (Colorado) and Joe Miller (Alaska),” the aide added. “And you know where the Republican Party nomination goes through: Iowa. So, imagine now, in a tea party era, who wins that.”

For the moment, Obama must adapt to a brand new political dynamic: a Republican-controlled House. The GOP’s congressional victories Tuesday are both an opportunity and a danger for the White House. Armed with subpoena power, Republicans can demand records and sworn testimony in open-ended investigations. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., has said he’ll send off a batch of letters to the Obama administration asking for information as early as Wednesday.

But Obama can also use the resurgent Republicans as a foil — much as Clinton did when Newt Gingrich and his forces gained control of the House in 1994. If there’s gridlock, the president can blame the Republicans. If the economy falters, he can say it’s up to the GOP to offer solutions. For months, Obama has said the Republicans have watched the action from the sidelines. Now he’ll argue they have no choice but to get in the game.

Obama is also likely to make significant changes on his own staff, easing some trusted advisers out of Washington and into position for his re-election campaign.

Even before Tuesday’s election, the new White House chief of staff Pete Rouse was undertaking a reorganization that may better position Obama for 2012. Senior adviser David Axelrod and deputy chief of staff Jim Messina will leave next year to join the re-election team in Chicago. Stepping into the White House as a senior adviser will be David Plouffe, an architect of Obama’s victory in 2008. Plouffe will maintain close ties to the campaign machinery and protect Obama’s re-election interests day-to-day.

The changes reflect the new political reality. In the first two years, Obama had big legislative goals, requiring a White House team that was skilled in advancing legislation. With the House now controlled by Republicans, passing legislation is less of a priority than protecting what Obama considers to be signature achievements: the health care overhaul and a new financial regulatory system.

Photo Galleries

Election Day 2010

Election Day 2010

Election day scenes from polling places around the Pittsburgh area, Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.